Wednesday, November 01, 2006

NFC Playoff Table: Week 8

The NFC playoff race got shaken up a bit this week, becoming more muddled in spots, and clearer in others. The Giants look like the favorite to win the NFC East, but New Orleans, Seattle and St. Louis all stumbled. That means the Vikings are still a favorite for a Wild Card berth, but rather then taking control of their own destiny, they instead laid an egg against the Patriots, leaving them tied with the Rams and Cowboys for the sixth best record in the NFC. Luckily for the Vikings, they chose to get destroyed by an AFC team, preserving their 4-1 conference record, and leaving them with the tiebreakers. And they should keep those tiebreaker, with 5 games left against NFC teams with losing records, and a home game against the Rams. Those games, along with their home game against a mediocre Jets team (no wins over teams with winning records) mean that the Vikings should 1) finish at least 10-6 and 2) finish with tiebreakers over their competition.

Of course, this all depends on whether or not the Vikings have the ability to stop teams from doing what the Patriots just did to them. That, and if Brad Childress remembers when calling plays that he has a good running back and a bad quarterback. His first chance to do so is on Sunday against San Francisco. I'll have a preview up tomorrow.

[Once again, due to formatting issues, the playoff table is done the page. Sorry about that.]








Formatting issues are....










A) Annoying









B) Obnoxious











C) Not easy to fix









D) All of the Above












The correct answer is....









D) All of the Above

Team

Record

NFC Record

Tiebreakers

Tiebreaker Games Left

Division Games Left

Opponents Left

MIN

4-3

4-1

SEA, CAR

STL

GB, @GB, @DET, @CHI

NYJ, ARZ, @SF

NYG

5-2

5-1

ATL

@CAR, NO

DAL, PHI, WAS

HOU, CHI, @JAX, @TEN

PHI

4-4

3-3

NONE

CAR, ATL

WAS, @WAS, @NYG, @DAL

TEN, @IND, BYE

DAL

4-3

2-2

CAR

NO, @ATL

@NYG, PHI, @WAS

ARZ, IND, TB, DET

NO

5-2

4-1

PHI

@DAL, @NYG

@ATL, CAR @TB

@PIT, CIN, SF, WAS

ATL

5-2

3-2

NONE

DAL, @PHI

NO, CAR, @TB

@DET, CLE, @BAL, @WAS,

CAR

4-4

2-3

NONE

STL, @PHI, NYG

TB, @ATL, @NO

@WAS, PIT, BYE

SEA

4-3

4-2

NYG

NONE

STL, @SF, @AZ, SF

OAK, GB, @DEN, SD, @TB

STL

4-3

3-2

NONE

@CAR, @MIN

@SEA, SF, AZ

KC, CHI, @OAK, WAS

2 comments:

Pacifist Viking said...

With 3 wins and a similar schedule to the Vikes, are we going to have to start considering the Packers, too?

TBird41 said...

I hope not. My rule of thumb to keep the table manageable is to only include .500 or better teams. So if they beat the Bills this week, that means they are on the table.

The thing is, the Packers aren't that good. They've just managed to capitalize on their easy games (all 3 wins are against one win teams). If they can go 3-1 over their next four games (@BUF, @MIN, NE, @SEA), they'll be in it. If they lose twice (or hopefully three times), they're probably done, sitting at six/seven losses, facing elimination with a loss and games left @CHI and against MIN. Their tiebreaker situation isn't that good either, with losses to NO, PHI and StL and a 2-4 conference record.

That all being said, I'd feel a lot better if the Bills came out and beat them on Sunday.